New Developments in 911 Truth

I ran across some fascinating stuff on 911 recently. The Catalytic Converter blogger published a piece yesterday with some evidence of a concerted effort by a group of 911 Truth researchers to shut down inquiry into the Pentagon attack and to deflect attention away from 911 to Peak Oil by the same group. As the Catalytic Converter wrote: "Who better to debunk a conspiracy than suppossed conspiracy researchers?" These people patrol the internet emplying standard smear tactics used against "consipiracy" theorists: ridicule, gatekeeping, name-calling, and attacks on bloggers and web site creators for statements made on sites that are linked on their sites or blogs. One person who has been doing this a lot lately is Mark Robinowitz, who seems to be allied with Mike Ruppert and John Judge. See also David McGowan for both a convincing argument that the No Plane theory is sound and for a hilarous debunking of Judge, and the like.

The amazing part of the Catalytic Converter post comes with a link to The Perfect Infidel blog, which passes along a startling suggestion that the Russian spy satellites captured photos of a ship launched drone heading toward and into the Pentagon on 9/11. This information has become currency in some fierce cross-blackmailing beteen world powers. Ever wonder why the United States talks tough against France but always backs off and becomes more friendly before push comes to shove? Or why, by the same token, do France and Russia back off from coming out more strongly against the United States?

More importantly for our purposes now, though, is the evidence that the Bush gang are very concerned about the No Plane theory. Perfect Infidel relates a dinner she had in Paris with some French government connected types:

The dinner itself was "normal" in every respect, and MOST of the conversation was also "normal." It only got strange when politics - including the subject of George Bush and 9-11 - was brought up.

Our friends who circulate socially among various government officials brought out some photos to show of a recent private party. Among the attendees of said party - which I reiterate, was private and not an "official function," was the brother of Vladimir Putin! There was the usual grouping of various ministers, AND one of the most powerful men in the Financial World (and here I don't mean America, I mean the GLOBAL Financial world!)

What was interesting about these photos was the obvious camaraderie of these individuals depicted in the photographs. There was Vlad's brother whooping it up with what were obviously close pals in France.

Hmmmm...

So, of course I asked about this. What came next was, in a sense, quite shocking. It seems that it is common knowledge in these circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft (seems to have been a drone type plane rather than a missle) that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and that, for various reasons this information has been withheld from the public.

I was naturally startled to hear this even though I have long held the opinion that it was NOT a commercial jetliner that hit the Pentagon. I think the thing that startled me was the fact that, if Russia (and perhaps other countries with satellites?) had proof that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, why weren't they revealing this?

It was explained to me that during part of the time George Bush was "incommunicado" on September 11, 2001, he was on the phone to Putin "negotiating." That was a polite way of saying "blackmailing." Apparently, Bush, by way of MOSSAD and/or the CIA had enough goods on Vlad to keep him silent.

Now THAT explains why Putin has not responded publicly to the rather obnoxious
criticisms of Russia made by Bush and Condi Rice.

In any event, it was explained to me further that these satellite photos HAD been revealed to Thierry Meyssan who was asked by either French or Russian intell to write his book "Pentagate" to "leak" the info that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. His instructions were, apparently, that he had to "make the case" without recourse to official backing; he couldn't refer to the satellite photos.

In addition to the Meyssan book, it was the Pentagon Strike video that kicked damage control into overdrive.

Perfect Infidel then mentions Mark Robinowitz's web site as a pillar of the
damage control team:

Another interesting event in this timeline was the creation of a website with the domain name oilempire.us. This site lists what it calls "Bogus 9-11 Websites" saying:

The three biggest stories used to alienate the public from 9/11 truth

1. No Planes on 9/11 (Pentagon, North Tower WTC, "pod plane" at SouthTower, Pennsylvania)

2. The Jews Did It (Israel had foreknowledge and possibly played a role, but that doesn't justify anti-semitism and Holocaust Denial)

3. The Victims' Phone Calls Were Faked (a way to keep the 9/11 families and the skeptics from working together)

why are there bogus 9/11 websites? a mix of malice and incompetence, but both make real evidence harder to find

Considering the very good case for the involvement of MOSSAD in 9-11, the
very good case that the victims phone calls WERE faked, not to mention what I
have discovered about satellite photos on 9-11, it sure does look like the Oil
Empire Website is a "plant," so to say. So I did a whois lookup. Here's what I
found:

...The site is claimed by a Mark Rabinowitz even if it was "prepared for use" as early as February of 2003. That, in itself, is rather suspicious. Seems that this was right about the time that the Meyssan book was making a splash.

What Ruppert, Robinowitz, et. al. seem to miss is that, now that the United States is no longer the hegemonic world power that it was a few short years ago, what the "average American" is prepared to accept as true is not as important as what the average world citizen is prepared to accept. The Perfect Infidel anecdote about the dinner shows that much of the world takes as given what many people in the United States wouldn't even allow themselves to consider. The ground is shifting.